State of Vermont makes its case against Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee at 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals
January 15, 2013
admin

The fate of the State of Vermont's long struggle to shutdown Entergy Nuclear's Vermont Yankee atomic reactor now rests in the hands of a three-judge panel at the 2nd Circuit Federal Court of Appeals in Manhattan. Yesterday, oral arguments were heard regarding Entergy v. Shumlin et al. Vermont is seeking to overturn a Brattleboro lower court judge's ruling a year ago that state laws had improperly strayed into radiological safety matters, the sole jurisdiction of the federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission, as settled by the 1983 PG&E (Pacific Gas and Electric) U.S. Supreme Court ruling. In addition to a large turn out of journalists from Vermont and beyond, a number of long-time Vermont Yankee opponents sent representatives to witness the proceeding, including Beyond Nuclear, Conservation Law Foundation, Citizen Awareness Network (CAN), Physicians for Social Responsibility, Shut It Down! affinity group, Solar Rollers, and Vermont Yankee Decommissioning Alliance (VYDA). By most accounts, the State of Vermont --represented by Attorney General William Sorrell, and David Frederick of the Washington, D.C. law firm Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel, P.L.L.C. (see photo) -- more than held its own.

Richard Watts (who took the photo above), author of Public Meltdown: The Story of the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant, covered the oral arguments on his blogThe Vermont Digger reported on this story, including a link to the audio of the full 37 minute long oral arguments. Vermont Public Radio filed two stories: "At Stake in Yankee Appeal: State's Rights and a Big Legal Bill," and "Appeals Judges Focus on 'Legislative Intent' in Yankee Case." The Associated Press, Burlington Free Press, Brattleboro Reformer, and Bloomberg have also reported on this story.

Update on January 16, 2013 by Registered Commenteradmin

And, as reported by the Associated Press, Entergy was back in court on Wednesday, this time before the Vermont Supreme Court. The New England Coalition on Nuclear Pollution requests that the Vermont Supreme Court order Entergy Vermont Yankee to shutdown, for lack of a Certificate of Public Good (CPG). Its old CPG expired, along with its original 40 year operating license, on March 21, 2012. The State of Vermont Public Service Board has yet to approve a new CPG for VY's continued operation.

Vermont Public Radio reported on this story (note that Leslie Sullivan Sachs and Nancy Rice, long-time Vermont Yankee opponents, are visible in the background of the photo). So has WCAX TV.

An op-ed by William Boardman entitled "Unlawful Nuclear Power in Vermont"  asserts that it is "Undisputed: Vermont Yankee Operates Unlawfully," due to its lack of a State of Vermont Public Service Board (PSB) Certificate of Public Good, as spelled out in a 2002 PSB order issued when Entergy took ownership of Vermont Yankee.

Update on January 18, 2013 by Registered Commenteradmin

Greenwire/E&E Publishing also reported on this story. Sandy Levine of Conservation Law Foundation, as well as Cheryl Hanna of Vermont Law School, have provided analyses in blogs.

Article originally appeared on Beyond Nuclear (https://archive.beyondnuclear.org/).
See website for complete article licensing information.