NEWS: On Fukushima Day, another door slams on U.S nuclear expansion

NEWS FROM BEYOND NUCLEAR  

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  Monday, March 11, 2013

CONTACT: Paul Gunter, Beyond Nuclear, 301-523-0201 (mobile); 301.270.2209 (o)

On Fukushima Day, another door slams shut on US nuclear expansion plans

Beyond Nuclear lauds decision not to green light third Maryland reactor

Takoma Park, MD — On a day when thousands around the world are protesting nuclear power to mark two years since the deadly Fukushima nuclear accident began in Japan, another door has slammed shut on nuclear expansion plans in the US.

Beyond Nuclear hailed Monday’s decision by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to deny an appeal by UniStar, wholly owned by French utility, Électricité de France (EdF), for a third reactor at the Calvert Cliffs nuclear power plant site on the Chesapeake Bay in Maryland.

“Électricité de France sank into the financial quicksand that is new reactor construction,”  said Paul Gunter, Director of the Reactor Oversight Project at Beyond Nuclear, an environmental advocacy group based in Takoma Park, MD. “US nuclear corporations are clearly unwilling to join EdF in nuclear energy’s economic quagmire, a pattern that has been only too evident at EdF’s other reactor projects in Europe.”

EdF had hoped to build an Evolutionary Power Reactor (EPR), a French Areva design originally targeted for six US nuclear sites. But the EPR, a new, untested design, already has a lamentable history in Europe. 

The EPR reactors under construction in Flamanville, France and Olkiluoto, Finland, are years behind schedule and enormously over-budget and the design has been challenged by safety authorities in France, Finland and Britain. Olkiluoto may now not be operational until 2016 — four years later than the original target date — and its price has more than doubled, soaring to $10 billion. Flamanville’s original budget has tripled. EdF’s UK reactor plans have been marked by the departure of a series of business partners.

“This decision could not be more timely, coming on the second anniversary of the Fukushima nuclear accident and on the heels of the recent decision of the Maryland State Legislature to adopt and invest in the development of offshore wind energy,” Gunter added. 

The NRC Order denied the EdF appeal on two grounds: on the agency’s policy  regarding foreign ownership, which is based on longstanding language in the Atomic Energy Act (AEA), which prohibits foreign ownership and control of US nuclear reactors; and that the applicants “continue to look for a U.S. partner, and have not amended their application.”

The applicant for a third Calvert Cliffs reactor was in trouble as soon as EdF’s US partner, Constellation Energy, withdrew. On August 30 2012, the NRC had given UniStar 60 more days to comply with the Atomic Energy Act (AEA) in order to be granted a license for a third reactor at Calvert Cliffs. 

After the 60 days expired, the NRC put the application on indefinite review. But when no US company stepped up to partner with EdF on the project, the NRC opted on Monday to deny the appeal. EdF could continue to search for a US partner but would need to start a new application for the Calvert Cliffs site.

“The nuclear retreat continues unabated,” Gunter pointed out. “Everywhere you look, new nuclear projects are either being canceled, or are encountering cost over-runs, and aging reactors are failing and permanently closing.” Gunter noted Duke Energy’s permanent closure of Florida’s Crystal River nuclear station and the Dominion Energy announcement of the permanent closure of Wisconsin’s Kewaunee nuclear station later this year.

In November 2008, three national safe energy groups — Beyond Nuclear, Nuclear Information & Resource Service, and Public Citizen — and the local citizens group Southern Maryland Citizen Alliance for Renewable Energy Solutions — formally petitioned the NRC licensing board for a hearing opposing the Calvert Cliffs 3 application. The joint petition included the contention that EdF, as the dominant owner of the third proposed reactor, was in violation of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 as amended and NRC licensing regulations, which prohibit controlling foreign ownership of a US nuclear plant. 

To read the full NRC Order, see: http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/calvert-cliffs-cola/cc3_order_03112013_denying_petition-for-review.pdf

To view a compilation of the Nuclear Retreat, see: http://www.beyondnuclear.org/the-nuclear-retreat/

Update on March 14, 2013 by admin

Washington Post, March 11, 2013, “In U.S., nuclear energy loses momentum amid economic head winds, safety issues”

No surprise, Vogtle nuclear expansion already over budget and behind schedule

Georgia Power's plan to expand the Vogtle nuclear power plant will take more than a year-and-a-half longer than expected and will cost about $740 million more than originally proposed.

The utility will pay more of the $14 billion projected cost because of increased capital costs and additional financing. Customers will be paying for their part of the expansion costs longer.

Customer fees will rise from $3.88 in 2011 to $5.11 and will continue to grow until the plant produces electricity, sometime around 2017 or 2018.

Areva loses a bundle in 2012

France's state-controlled nuclear engineering giant Areva lost $130 million in 2012 and its business is struggling to move past the Japan's nuclear disaster and a troubled mining venture. The company lost (EURO)2.5 billion in 2011, a year that saw many countries rethink their use of the nuclear energy after the earthquake and tsunami that devastated the Fukushima power plant. Much of those losses were due to a troubled uranium mining venture that was the subject of investigation.

Namibia uranium mine cutting workers as demand drops

The world's third largest uranium mine - Roessing in Namibia - is cutting its work force, eliminating 276 of the 1,592 jobs. The cuts are in response to low prices and reduced demand, in some part a response to the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

Nuclear Relapse? Canceled! Nuclear power? Game over!

Peter BradfordAs reported by ScienceDaily in an article entitled "U.S. May Face Inevitable Nuclear Power Exit,"  the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists (BAS) has concluded its three part "Nuclear Exit" series with a look at the United States. The previous two installments examined the nuclear power phase-out in Germany, and the nuclear power status quo in France.

The BAS U.S. coverage features former U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Commissioner, Union of Concerned Scientists board member, and Vermont Law School professor Peter Bradford's "How to close the U.S. nuclear industry: Do nothing," which concludes that, without massive taxpayer or ratepayer infusions, almost all proposed new reactors will not happen, and currently operating reactors will permanently shutdown by mid-century, unless the NRC rubber-stamps 80 years of operations (as opposed to the current, already risky 60). More.