« House Republican leaders demand Yucca dump be included in irradiated nuclear fuel centralized interim storage bill | Main | NRC pleads lack of sufficient funds to resume Yucca Mountain dump licensing proceeding »
Tuesday
Jan152013

Two dozen groups rebut NEI, supplement comments to NRC on Nuke Waste Con Game

Environmental coalition attorney Diane CurranAn environmental coalition comprised of two dozen organizations, including Beyond Nuclear, today submitted supplemental public comments to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) regarding the agency's court-vacated Nuclear Waste Confidence Decision and Rule. The supplemental comments constituted a rebuttal to comments submitted by the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI), the nuclear power industry's lobbying arm in Washington, D.C.

The coalition held a press conference today, featuring four speakers: Arjun Makhijani, President of Institute for Energy and Environmental Research, one of the coalition's expert witnesses; Diane Curran of the Washington, D.C. law firm Harmon, Curran, Spielberg + Eisenberg, LLP, a lead attorney for the coalition (see photo, left); John Runkle, an attorney with NC WARN (North Carolina Waste Awareness and Reduction Network), another coalition member; and Phillip Museegas, an attorney with Riverkeeper, and another expert witness for the coalition, of which Riverkeeper is also a member.

The U.S. federal court of appeals for the D.C. circuit ruled on June 8th that NRC "merely hoped" for a repository someday, and ordered the agency to undertake an environmental impact statement study on the long-term consequences of no repository ever opening, that is the long-term risks of on-site irradiated nuclear fuel storage in pools and dry casks.

Dr. Makhijani also rebutted NEI's claim that the Feb. 2002 U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Final Environmental Impact Statement for the proposed (now cancelled) Yucca Mountain, Nevada dumpsite could serve as a quick and ready stand-in for NRC's EIS consideration of the environmental impacts of a "no repository" scenario. Dr. Makhijani has documented that DOE significantly underestimated the environmental impacts of abandoning high-level radioactive wastes forever at reactor sites, and urged NRC to undertake a serious study of the consequences of the court-ordered consideration of a repository never opening in the U.S.

The coalition issued a press release; the full audio recording of the press conference is posted on-line.

The coalition's January 2nd public comments, including expert witness testimonies, are posted on-line. So are the coalition's supplemental comments submitted today, put together in rebuttal to NEI's Jan. 2nd comments.