Search
JOIN OUR NETWORK

     

     

 

 

ARTICLE ARCHIVE

Nuclear Power

Nuclear power cannot address climate change effectively or in time. Reactors have long, unpredictable construction times are expensive - at least $12 billion or higher per reactor. Furthermore, reactors are sitting-duck targets vulnerable to attack and routinely release - as well as leak - radioactivity. There is so solution to the problem of radioactive waste.

.................................................................................................................................................................................................................

Entries from July 1, 2011 - July 31, 2011

Wednesday
Jul202011

MARKEY TO NRC COMMISSIONERS SVINICKI AND MAGWOOD: STOP ABDICATING RESPONSIBILITY

U.S. Rep. Ed Markey (D-MA)In a media release, U.S. Rep. Markey (pictured left) stated:

WASHINGTON, D.C. (July 20, 2011) – Today, Congressman Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.), the top Democrat on the Natural Resources Committee and a senior Member of the Energy and Commerce Committee, released the following statement in response to the votes of NRC Commissioners Kristine L. Svinicki and William D. Magwood to delay even the consideration of the adoption of the recommendations of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s (NRC’s) Near Term Task Force reviewing NRC processes and regulations in the wake of the Fukushima nuclear meltdowns.
 
Commissioners Svinicki and Magwood have rejected the Chairman’s call to vote on the Fukushima task force’s recommendations within 90 days,” said Rep. Markey. “Instead, they want to direct the NRC staff to endlessly study the NRC staff’s own report before they will even consider a single recommendation made by the very same NRC staff.  We do not need another study to study the NRC staff’s study. This is an unacceptable abdication of responsibility, and I call on these two Commissioners to do their jobs and quickly move to order the adoption of the recommendations of the Fukushima task force.”
 
Commissioner Svinicki’s vote can be found at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/commission/cvr/2011/2011-0093vtr-kls.pdf
 

Commissioner Magwood’s vote can be fount at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/commission/cvr/2011/2011-0093vtr-wdm.pdf
 

# # #

Tuesday
Jul192011

Flooded nuclear power plant cited for yet another safety violation

The Fort Calhoun nuclear power plant, most of which is inundated under a couple feet of water due to historic flooding on the Missouri River, has been cited by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission for yet another safety violation, reports Omaha's ABC t.v. affiliate. This latest decrease in safety margin is all the more alarming given that just six feet of flood margin or so remains before "all bets are off" on the nuclear utility's ability to maintain essential cooling to the reactor core, as well as the high-level radioactive waste storage indoor pool and outdoor dry casks. Adding to the risk, Nebraska is suffering an alarming heat wave, which has contributed to electrical outages elsewhere in the Omaha Public Power District's service area, reports the Omaha World-Herald. The loss of the primary electric grid at Ft. Calhoun, as by extreme weather, could be the first domino leading to a catastrophic radiation release, as seen at Fukushima Daiichi.

Tuesday
Jul192011

State of Vermont wins first round in legal battle against Vermont Yankee

As reported by Vermont Public Radio, in an 18 page ruling U.S. District Judge J. Garvan Murtha denied Entergy Nuclear's request for an injunction against the Vermont state law which would force the closure of Vermont Yankee atomic reactor at the end of its original 40 year license next March. Entergy Nuclear needs to refuel Vermont Yankee this fall if it is to operate the reactor beyond March 22, 2012, so sought an injunction against the state's mandated closure by July 23rd, in order to decide whether or not to order the replacement fuel. The judge clarified that his rejection of Entergy's request for an injunction does not indicate how he will rule on the overall case, in which Entergy seeks to nullify the Vermont state law via federal pre-emption over nuclear safety matters. Judge Murtha has announced he will hear that case beginning on September 12th. On legal grounds, Vermont has argued its decision to shut down Vermont Yankee has to do with economics and reliability, not health and safety, which are federally pre-empted. "From Fukushima to VT Yankee: The Vermont Nuclear Power Conference" will be held in Burlington on  Saturday, July 23rd, to build further momentum to shut Vermont Yankee.

Tuesday
Jul122011

Risks of flooding at Callaway

Kay Drey, long-time watchdog on the Callaway nuclear power plant in Missouri, and a Beyond Nuclear board of directors member, has written Arnie Gundersen of Fairewinds Associates in Vermont, asking about the risks to the water intake structure from flooding. She references Callaway's 1975 Construction Permit, as well as its 1982 Final Environmental Statement. Kay also wrote the pamphlet "Routine Radioactive Releases from Nuclear Power Plants in the United States: What Are the Dangers?", another issue referenced in her letter.

Monday
Jul042011

Dr. Michio Kaku discusses radioactive risks from fires and floods

Dr. Michio Kaku (pictured left), a professor of theoretical physics at City University of New York, a radio host, and popular t.v. personality who has been interviewed extensively by national news media regarding the Fukushima nuclear catastrophe, has written "United States Hit With a Triple Nuclear Threat - How Dangerous is it?" and "Preparing for the 100 Year Storm and Wondering if the Three Simultaneous Nuclear Crises are an Accident?". Kaku questions whether global climate change could account for the severe weather extremes currently threatening nuclear facilities simultaneously -- historic floods on the Missouri River putting the Fort Calhoun and Cooper atomic reactors in Nebraska at risk; historic wildfires in New Mexico that nearly overtook the Los Alamos nuclear weapons lab. He warns that "we might have more 'unprecedented' nuclear crises due to historically bizarre weather patterns."