Search
JOIN OUR NETWORK

     

     

 

 

ARTICLE ARCHIVE

Nuclear Power

Nuclear power cannot address climate change effectively or in time. Reactors have long, unpredictable construction times are expensive - at least $12 billion or higher per reactor. Furthermore, reactors are sitting-duck targets vulnerable to attack and routinely release - as well as leak - radioactivity. There is so solution to the problem of radioactive waste.

.................................................................................................................................................................................................................

Entries from March 1, 2010 - March 31, 2010

Tuesday
Mar162010

Illinois votes to reverse ban on new reactors

With little debate, according to news reports, and even less press coverage, the Illinois State Senate voted to reverse a ban on building new nuclear power plants in the state. Illinois is already the state with the most reactors - 11 - in the country. There was a loan vote against the reversal from Sen. Jeff Schoenberg, D-Evanston. The condition of the original ban was that no new nuclear plants could be built "until such time as the federal government has an operational disposal facility for the dangerous and long-lived high-level radioactive wastes (HLRW) they would generate," according to Dave Kraft of Nuclear Energy Information Service. Kraft decried the vote, stating: "Beware the Ides of March – and the ignorance of the some Illinois legislators on nuclear matters."

Monday
Mar012010

Alec Baldwin says "no" to new nukes

Writing in the Huffington Post, Alec Baldwin decries the Obama decision to fund construction of new reactors an gives a tip of his hat to Beyond Nuclear board member, Karl Grossman.