 An   infrared photo showing the thermal heat of a German CASTOR cask filled   with irradiated nuclear fuel being transported by rail to Gorleben.  The  high-level radioactivity, not the thermal heat, is the hazard to  human  health, safety, and the environment, however.As  trumpeted  by its "Gang of Four" co-sponsors (Republicans Lisa Murkowski  of Alaska,  Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, and Democrats Maria Cantwell  of  Washington State and Dianne Feinstein of California) in a press release, the Nuclear Waste Administration Act of 2015 has been introduced in the U.S. Senate.
An   infrared photo showing the thermal heat of a German CASTOR cask filled   with irradiated nuclear fuel being transported by rail to Gorleben.  The  high-level radioactivity, not the thermal heat, is the hazard to  human  health, safety, and the environment, however.As  trumpeted  by its "Gang of Four" co-sponsors (Republicans Lisa Murkowski  of Alaska,  Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, and Democrats Maria Cantwell  of  Washington State and Dianne Feinstein of California) in a press release, the Nuclear Waste Administration Act of 2015 has been introduced in the U.S. Senate.
Although the devil is always in the details, and further careful   analysis and comparison is required, on the surface it appears that this   session's bill is very similar to previous attempts in the Senate to   open a "pilot" parking lot dump for commercial high-level radioactive   waste (HLRW) in less than a decade, followed a few years later by a  full-scale  parking lot dump. This included Senate   Bill (S.B.) 1240, the Nuclear Waste Administration Act of 2013, about   which Beyond Nuclear published a comprehensive critique of the scheme's  many risks.
As  of April 3rd, the current Senate bill, given the bill number S. 854, is  not yet available for public review. Only basic information about the  proposed legislation is yet available.
Targeted locations for "consolidated" or "centralized interim storage   sites" have yet to be specified. However, Waste Control Specialists in   Andrews County, Texas -- already threatening the adjacent Ogallala   Aquifer with so-called "low" level radioactive waste burials -- has   volunteered to become a parking lot dump. Pro-nuclear "booster clubs" at   Savannah River Site, South Carolina, the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant,   New Mexico, and elsewhere are also blinded by radioactive dollar signs,   and offering their "services."
Other top targets include nuclear power plants, such as Dresden in   Illinois, as well as Native American reservations. The latter is an   egregious example of environmental racism.
The press release speaks of "priority" transfers of irradiated   nuclear fuel. "Stranded" or "orphaned" irradiated fuel, from permanently   shutdown and even completely decommissioned nuclear power plants,  would  be given priority by the bill. "Emergency" transfers are also   mentioned, as from on-site storage locations at risk of natural   disasters.
Even the "pilot" parking lot dump would launch unprecented numbers of   HLRW shipments, by truck, train, and/or barge onto the roads, rails,   and/or waterways. The full-scale parking lot dump scheme would involve   even greater numbers of potential Mobile Chernobyls, Floating   Fukushimas, and dirty bombs on wheels.
However, as was made clear by the Private Fuel Storage fiasco,   shipments to parking lot dumps could be "returned to sender," if   permanent repository plans fall through. If 50 casks of HLRW had ever   been shipped from the Maine Yankee atomic reactor and parked at the   Skull Valley Goshutes Indian Reservation in Utah, they would have had to   be shipped back to their point of origin when the Yucca Mountain,   Nevada dump was canceled by the Obama administration. A 4,000-mile round   trip, all for naught -- risking radiological disaster every mile of  the  way, as from severe accidents or even attacks.
As described by a U.S. Department of Energy blog,    the Senate bill announcement came on the same day as Energy Secretary    Ernest Moniz announced a major reversal of U.S. radioactive waste   policy.  Decades-old plans to "co-mingle" nuclear weapons HLRWs and   commercial  irradiated fuel are over. Separate repositories for   permanent disposal  of "defense" and commercial HLRWs will now be built.   In addition, Moniz  expressed full DOE support for congressional calls   for "centralized  interim storage" parking lot dumps.
Moniz spoke at the Bipartisan Policy Center.  A case study of the revolving door between government, industry, and  academia, or the incenstuous nature of the nuclear establishment,  Moniz  served on President Obama's  Blue Ribbon Commission (BRC) for   America's Nuclear Future from 2010-12. (For that matter, the BRC was   housed at DOE's Office of Nuclear Energy, charged with promoting the   atomic industry!) So too  did former U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission   Chairman Allison  Macfarlane, as well as Secretary of Defense Chuck   Hagel. BRC member,  U.S. Senator Pete Domenici (R-NM), serves at the   Bipartisan Policy  Center, as does the former BRC Designated Federal Officer,  Timothy Frazier. (As described in his BPC bio,  Frazier worked for 20 years, including in the promotional Office of  Nuclear Energy, on all aspects of nuclear power and radioactive waste,  and even as a nuclear weapons engineer.) John Kotek, currently DOE principal deputy assistant secretary in the Office of Nuclear Energy, was staff director of the BRC (see Kotek's DOE blog, linked above).
The simultaneous timing of Moniz's announcements, and the Senate bill launch, begs the question: were they coincidental, or coordinated?