Search
JOIN OUR NETWORK

     

     

 

 

Centralized Storage

With the scientifically unsound proposed Yucca Mountain radioactive waste dump now canceled, the danger of "interim" storage threatens. This means that radioactive waste could be "temporarily" parked in open air lots, vulnerable to accident and attack, while a new repository site is sought.

.................................................................................................................................................................................................................

Entries from June 1, 2020 - June 30, 2020

Tuesday
Jun302020

The Thom Hartmann Program: 173,000 Tons of Nuclear Waste Under Your Feet! (w/Beyond Nuclear)

Thom HartmannThey want to double the amount of nuclear waste buried under your feet... Trump wants to test nuclear weapons ... you are about to be exposed to nuclear waste ... Nuclear waste is about to be buried in New Mexico. Really? A vast waste facility to be built in NM with both reprocessing and simply dumping it. How will the fresh water you drink be affected? Kevin Kamps joined Thom to discover the news of nuclear waste coming to NM.

Thom Hartmann (photo, left) hosts Beyond Nuclear's Kevin Kamps. Watch/listen to the recording, here.

Saturday
Jun272020

Beyond Nuclear public comments #10, re: NRC's Holtec/ELEA CISF DEIS -- re: NRC collusion with Holtec on CISF rubber-stamp is illegal, dangerous

Submitted via: <holtec-cisfeis@nrc.gov>

Dear NRC Staff,

NRC's collusion and complicity in rubber-stamping license application approvals for CISFs -- both Holtec/ELEA's in NM, as well as ISP/WCS's in TX -- is objectionable. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission is supposed to protect public health, safety, security, and the environment. As the country's nuclear safety regulatory agency, NRC is not a policy setting agency, and is not supposed to promote nuclear power industry schemes, such as these CISFs.

Yet, at its late 2015 Division of Spent Fuel Management RegCon (Regulatory Conference), NRC's Tony Hsia, Acting Director of the Division of Spent Fuel Management, in his closing remarks, concluded the two-day symposium with no less than a pep rally cry. He passionately called for industry and NRC (as well as DOE, and other nuclear establishment players) to work together ("[If we] all work together, we can make it [centralized interim storage] happen!"), to open de facto permanent, surface storage, parking lot dumps, such as at Interim Storage Partners/Waste Control Specialists, LLC in Andrews County, TX, and/or Holtec International/Eddy-Lea Energy Alliance, near WIPP in NM. He even pumped his fist in the air when he did so. Such advocacy in favor of the proposed CISFs, by a senior NRC manager, was incredibly inappropriate.

Such schizophrenic safety regulation/industry promotion imbalance is what led to the demise of the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission by the mid-1970s. Stringent safety regulation and unbridled industry advocacy are mutual exclusive, of course. NRC rose from AEC's ashes with the clear mandate to "protect people and the environment," as the NRC logo puts it. DOE was given the nuclear advocacy role, embodied in its unbridled Office of Nuclear Energy (ONE). NRC has violated its mandate. It has strayed very far into the policy setting and industry advocacy arena.

NRC Staff, as well as the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, and even the NRC Commissioners, have done so ever since Tony Hsia's incredibly inappropriate pep rally cheer in favor of CISF licensing in late 2015. NRC's complicity and collusion with Holtec/ELEA and ISP/WCS is not only immoral and illegal, it is very dangerous.

The Japanese Parliament concluded that the root cause of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear catastrophe was collusion between regulator, industry, and government officials. It was the reason the three reactors, that melted down and exploded, were so very vulnerable to the earthquake and tsunami that struck them on 3/11/11 in the first place. Such dangerous collusion exists in spades in the U.S., as on radioactive waste, as between NRC (Staff, Licensing Board Panel, and Commissioners) and Holtec/ELEA, re: the proposed CISF in NM.

These comments are submitted on behalf of our members and supporters in NM and TX, and across the U.S. along impacted Mobile Chernobyl transport routes.

Please acknowledge receipt of these comments. Thank you.

Saturday
Jun272020

Beyond Nuclear public comments #9, re: NRC's Holtec/ELEA CISF DEIS, Docket ID NRC-2018-0052 -- re: Cerro Grande Fire exacerbates the environmental injustice of the Holtec CISF scheme

Submitted via: <holtec-cisfeis@nrc.gov>
Dear NRC Staff,

On Sunday, May 10, 2020, the following article was published:

This is yet another reason that the Holtec/ELEA CISF targeted at NM is one environmental justice burden too many. So too the WCS/ISP CISF targeted at the NM border at Eunice, just a mile or so into TX. NM has suffered enough from the nuclear industry already.
The map is posted online here:
NM has too long shouldered too many EJ burdens -- nuclear, fossil fuel, and other hazards.
For this reason alone, the Holtec/ELEA CISF is a non-starter, as yet another, major, EJ violation.
So too is the WCS/ISP CISF in TX, a mile or so from the NM border at Eunice.
These comments are submitted on behalf of our members and supporters in NM and TX, as well as across the U.S. along the impacted transport routes.
Please acknowledge the receipt of these comments. Thank you.
Saturday
Jun272020

Beyond Nuclear public comment #8, re: NRC's Holtec/ELEA CISF DEIS, Docket ID NRC-2018-0052 -- re: the license for Private Fuel Storage, LLC, CISF -- targeted at Skull Valley Goshutes Indian Reservation in Utah -- is not terminated, contradicting NRC Staff assertions to the contrary

Submitted via: <holtec-cisfeis@nrc.gov>

Dear NRC Staff,

A colleague has spotted a significant error in the Overview attached to both the Holtec and the ISP/WCS NRC DEIS documents (ISP/WCS is a second CISF, targeted at west Texas, just 39 miles from Holtec's CISF in NM, according to Holtec's CEO, Krishna Singh):

Don Hancock of Southwest Research and Information Center (SRIC) in Albuquerque, NM has pointed out:

"The Overview (like the Holtec one) again repeats the factual error that PFS's [Private Fuel Storage, LLC] license is terminated (page 4)."

Here is the false statement, as printed in NRC's Overview:

"The NRC previously licensed one other away-from-reactor dry cask spent fuel storage facility, called Private Fuel Storage (NUREG-1714); however, that facility was never built and the license was subsequently terminated." (emphasis added) 

This is not true. The license was not subsequently terminated.

Thus, NRC's CISF DEIS Overviews, re: both the Holtec/ELEA and the ISP/WCS CISFs, are inaccurate as to NRC's own licensing decisions.

NRC made the same mistake in its Holtec/ELEA NM CISF DEIS summary/overview, first published on March 10, 2020, as it also has done in its ISP/WCS TX CISF DEIS summary/overview.

And the DEIS documents themselves do not state that the PFS license is terminated. So in that sense, the summaries/overviews contradict the DEIS documents, as well.

Significantly, if Holtec International/Eddy-Lea Energy Alliance, Interim Storage Partners/Waste Control Specialists, and the nuclear power utilities, were serious about these CISFs being entirely private, then why not use the license already rubber-stamped by NRC at PFS more than a decade ago? Why seek news CISF licenses at Holtec/ELEA in NM, and at ISP/WCS in TX? Because the actual goal is to transfer title/ownership, and liability, onto the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) -- that is, federal taxpayers. Which is illegal, a violation of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, as Amended. This illegality is at the heart of Beyond Nuclear's lawsuit against both CISFs. Don't Waste MI et al. (a seven-group national grassroots environmental coalition), Sierra Club, and Fasken Oil and Ranch, have also challenged this violation of the NWPA represented by these CISF schemes, and NRC's complicity in them, in violation of federal laws like the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, as Amended, and the Administrative Procedure Act.

Not that Beyond Nuclear and our environmental and environmental justice allies think the PFS CISF targeting the Skull Valley Goshutes was or is a good idea. Quite the opposite. It was and is a dangerously bad idea, and an outrageous violation of environmental justice. Learn more about the environmental movement's successful resistance to the PFS CISF, a victory won in close solidarity and collaboration with Native American partners, including Skull Valley Goshute dump opponents Margene Bullcreek and Sammy Blackbear, Indigenous Environmental Network, Honor the Earth, and others, posted online at this link: <http://archives.nirs.us/radwaste/scullvalley/skullvalley.htm>.

The following documentation shows that the PFS license was never terminated, as NRC Staff have falsely stated in their CISF DEIS Overviews:

PFS / NRC - Withdrawal Of License Termination Request.

Document Title: Withdrawal of Termination Request of NRC licence SNM-2513 for Private Fuel Storage, LLC.
Document Type: Letter
Document Date: 09/12/2014

Document Title: Letter To R. M. Palmberg re: Withdrawal Of License Termination Request.
Document Type: Letter
Document Date: 09/18/2014
Such glaring NRC Staff errors must be corrected in the Holtec/ELEA, as well as the ISP/WCS, CISF DEIS documentation packages, including the erroneous Overviews.
These comments are submitted on behalf of Beyond Nuclear's members and supporters in NM, TX, and across the U.S. along impacted transport routes.

Please acknowledge receipt of these comments. Thank you.

Saturday
Jun272020

Beyond Nuclear public comment #7, re: NRC's Holtec/ELEA CISF DEIS, Docket ID NRC-2018-0052 -- re: Environmental Justice (EJ), Environmental Injustice, Environmental Racism, Radioactive Racism

Submitted via: <holtec-cisfeis@nrc.gov>

Dear NRC Staff,

This proposal is a severe violation of environmental justice. Holtec is targeting southeastern NM, where many of the surrounding communities in the area are majority Hispanic, or close to it. The Mescalero Apache Indian Reservation (itself previously targeted for a CISF, first by the U.S. Department of Energy Nuclear Waste Negotiator, and then by Private Fuel Storage, LLC, its container-provider none other than Holtec!) is not far away.

While a lot of money has been made in the Permian Basin from fossil fuel and nuclear industries, that wealth is not equitably distributed nor shared with the local population. Thus, any shenanigans involving average, median, or mean wealth levels in the area are inappropriate. There are serious pockets of poverty throughout the southeastern New Mexico region, and the rest of the state as a whole. In fact, New Mexico ranks towards the very bottom of all 50 states in numerous demographic measures of health, wealth, education, etc.

Thus, there are very significant environmental justice issues involving low income and/or people of color communities in southeastern NM being targeted for this dump.

As shown by a remarkable map by Deborah Reade of Santa Fe, NM, southeastern NM, and the rest of the state, bears a tremendous pollution burden from these fossil fuel (concentrated in the Permian Basin, in NM's southeastern corner) and nuclear (throughout NM, but with a particular concentration of significant polluting facilities in/near the southeastern corner) and other hazardous industries.

See this map posted online here:

http://static1.1.sqspcdn.com/static/f/356082/28292760/1588368272923/2020-ThreatsMap_11x17-v2.pdf?token=oopcheAXONZota6%2Bd%2FqgHb87tEM%3D

It is entitled "Water, Air, and Land: A Sacred Trust."

Focusing just on southeastern NM, the map shows the following dirty, dangerous, and expensive nuclear industries present:

Waste Control Specialists (Texas dump) and proposed spent fuel rod storage site (the already present WCS dump is a national dump-site for so-called "low" level radioactive waste; its sibling irradiated nuclear fuel CISF would hold up to 40,000 metric tons of highly radioactive waste);

Eden radioisotopes (proposed reactor);

URENCO USA (uranium enrichment plant) -- this was stopped in Louisiana, and Tennessee, in the 1990s and early 2000s, due to its environmental justice violations, but unfortunately was rammed through, including by NRC rubber-stamp, despite best efforts by a broad environmental and environmental justice coalition, to stop it;

Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (dump) -- WIPP had a supposedly impossible leak to the environment on Valentine's Day 2014, leading to a three-year shutdown, and $2 billion in recovery costs -- nearly two-dozen workers at the surface were exposed to ultra-hazardous alpha radiation inhalation doses, as are countless residents downwind, as plutonium and other trans-uranic pollutants are very long-lived hazards -- the highly controversial WIPP site was widely resisted in NM -- it is the only geologic repository for radioactive waste in the country -- a promise was made at the time of WIPP's opening, that if NM took military plutonium and TRU disposal at WIPP, the state would not be targeted for high-level radioactive waste disposal or even storage in the future -- the Holtec/ELEA CISF scheme breaks that promise;

International Isotopes (DU hexafluoride de-conversion facility--on hold) -- but the risk of its actual construction and operation is yet another potentially foreseeable cumulative impact that must be accounted for.

Gnome-Coach Experimental Test Site -- an underground nuclear weapon detonation!;

and of course the Holtec International proposed spent fuel rod storage site -- the subject of this very DEIS.

That is just in southeast NM, or immediately on the border in Texas. The Interim Storage Partners/Waste Control Specialists CISF should be included in this EJ analysis, and otherwise in the DEIS, as the two CISFs would be only 39 miles apart (this distance according to Holtec CEO Krishna Singh, at his license application unveiling press conference on Capitol Hill in early April 2017; this DEIS says 45 miles apart). So should the WCS national "low" level radioactive waste dump. In fact, the largely Hispanic community of Eunice, NM is only about five miles from WCS, TX. It is the nearest town. And certain surface, and perhaps even ground, water flow pathways, flow back into NM from the WCS, TX site.

Just the list above represents a tremendous nuclear pollution EJ burden for southeastern NM. The Holtec/ELEA (and ISP/WCS) would represent a major additional nuclear pollution and risk burden, on top of what is already borne by the low income and/or people of color communities in southeastern NM.

Of course, southeastern NM is also burdened with a very large fossil fuel pollution burden, as the map also shows. The Permian Basin oil and gas fields are the busiest/most concentrated in North America, and the second busiest/most intensive in the world, after only the Middle East. This is an additional, major EJ burden on southeastern NM.

But, as the map shows, the list of historic and still ongoing nuclear abuses of NM.

Los Alamos National Laboratory has been making a large-scale, concentrated radioactive and toxic chemical mess of its neighborhood since 1943. This is especially an EJ burden for the Pueblo Indian communities listed on the map, Los Alamos's neighbors who have lived there since time immemorial, long before 1943. Nowadays, as with the Trump administration proposal to expand plutonium pit production at Los Alamos for new nuclear weaponry, the nuclear abuses continue and expand there.

As shown on the map, the smoke plumes from the Cerro Grande Fire (May 2000) show the not only New Mexicans, but even people in other states downwind, were exposed to radioactive (including plutonium) and toxic fallout and inhalation doses. And the Las Conchas Fire boundaries (June 2011) shows that such risks continue, and worsen, in an age of global warming mega-droughts in NM.

The Trinity Test Site (first nuclear explosion), which occurred on July 16, 1945, haunts the Tularosa Basin Downwinders Consortium, 75 years later. They have never been compensated for their suffering and losses, as documented at their website: <https://www.trinitydownwinders.com/>

Sandia National Laboratories, and Kirtland Airforce Base's Kirtland Underground Munitions Storage Complex (1,900+ nuclear weapons) also puts Albuquerque at risk. The Mixed Waste Landfill puts Albuquerque's drinking water supply at risk.

Then of course, there is the uranium mining and milling region of northwestern NM, and the Four Corners area. This is of course a largely Native American region, including the Navajo/Diné, numerous Pueblo Indian tribes, and even Utes, as in Colorado. As the map lists, there are a large number of nuclear pollution sources just in this quadrant of NM:

Shiprock Mill and Disposal Cell;

Ambrosia Lake Mill and Disposal Cell;

UNC (United Nuclear Corporation) Mining and Milling, Church Rock Mill -- Church Rock was the scene, on July 16, 1979, of one of the worst radiological releases in U.S. history, when an earthen dam failed, releasing a large amount of radioactive and toxic uranium mill liquid waste into the Rio Puerco River, which traditional Navajo/Diné shepherds utilize for drinking and irrigation water (note that this marks the second mention of a nuclear disaster in NM that has happened on July 16th -- along with the Trinity blast, above; NRC's choice of July 16, 2018, to docket the Holtec/ELEA CISF application for licensing, and announce it in the Federal Register, marked a ghoulish new low of tone deafness and lack of compassion at the agency, itself an EJ violation);

(Quivira) Ambrosia Lake Mill & Disposal Site 2;

Phillips Mill;

Homestake/Barrick Gold [and Uranium] Mining Company Mill & Disposal Site;

(SOHIO) LBAR Mill Site;

Jackpile Mine;

Cebolleta Project (mines and mill);

Anaconda/ARCO Bluewater Mill & Disposal Site.

The open pit uranium mine located on the Laguna Pueblo is the largest on the planet. Its downwind and downstream pollution emissions have harmed the Laguna Pueblo, its immediate neighbors, as well as others downwind and downstream.

And as if the nuclear detonation site in southeastern NM was not enough abuse, there is also one in northern NM -- the Gasbuggy Experimental Test Site.

The Ute Mountain Ute tribe is mentioned in the extreme northwestern quadrant of the map. The Ute Mountain Ute have the dubious distinction of "hosting" (unwillingly) the White Mesa uranium mill, a highly polluting radioactive facility where many nefarious activities take place (radioactive waste "processing," storage, and even disposal, done under the supposed excuse of uranium extraction from waste streams imported from across the continents, and perhaps even overseas).

As I mentioned during my oral comments on the NRC webinar/call-in on June 23, 2020, such a list as the one depicted on the map above is nothing short of nightmarish. It represents a health, safety, environmental, and economic catastrophe for the indigenous peoples of NM, as well as other low income and people of color communities in the Land of Enchantment.

NM has already suffered a bad enough nuclear nightmare since 1943, one that continues to the present day. The Holtec/ELEA CISF (and the ISP/WCS CISF, for that matter) represent the straw that breaks the camel's back -- one more nuclear abuse and EJ violation too many.

Of course, as the map also shows, NM has suffered not only a nuclear nightmare. The fossil fuel pollution in the northwestern quadrant of NM is also concentrated and severe.

Just one more recent example of the eco-disasters this area has suffered includes the Gold King Mine toxic waste water release of 2015, epicentered near Silverton, CO. It was caused, ironically enough, by human error perpetrated by none other than the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and its contractor, Environmental Restoration LLC of Missouri.

The trickery employed in Holtec's Environment Report and NRC's DEIS, in order to find no EJ impact, is to only compare southeastern NM (and only out to a radius of 50 miles from the Holtec CISF site, at that), with the rest of the State of NM. But of course, comparing s.e. NM near Holtec to the country as a whole, would show a much greater concentration of Hispanics and Native Americans, than is typical of the rest of the country as a whole. NRC's 50-miles out from Holtec's CISF radius focus, and then only in comparison to the rest of the State of NM, blinds it to the bigger picture of the country as a whole. Combined with the fact that NM as a whole ranks towards the very bottom of all 50 states on many socio-economic indicators, NRC's willful blindness to the EJ impacts of the Holtec CISF proposal is an outrage. NRC's own behavior is an EJ violation, as is Holtec's CISF proposal to begin with!

This is further underscored by the experience of Alliance for Environmental Strategies in the NRC ASLB licensing proceeding in this very case. AFES is a largely Hispanic EJ group in s.e. NM. It intervened against the Holtec CISF, raising EJ contentions. Incredibly, the ASLB and NRC never even clearly acknowledged or recognized AFES's legal standing to bring such contentions. But both ASLB and NRC did reject AFES's EJ contentions outright -- the supposed excuse for not having to ruling on AFES's legal standing. Such ASLB and NRC behavior is, in itself, a blatant EJ violation, on its face!

It is worth noting that Holtec's previous attempt at a CISF was targeted at the Skull Valley Goshutes Indian Reservation in Utah. Holtec would have been the container supplier -- 4,000 Holtec containers, to "temporarily store" 40,000 metric tons of irradiated nuclear fuel at the surface. A consortium of a dozen nuclear power utilities comprised Private Fuel Storage, LLC (PFS). Despite opposition by traditional Skull Valley Goshutes, such as Sammy Blackbear, as well as Margene Bullcreek, leader of Ohngo Gaudadeh Devia Awareness (or OGD Awareness, Goshute for "Mountain/Timber Setting Community"), a grassroots group of traditional tribal members opposed to the dump, the PFS license was rubber-stamped in the end by NRC. When that happened, flying in the face of opposition not only by the State of Utah, and a coalition of nearly 500 environmental and environmental justice organizations across the country, I dubbed NRC the Nuclear Racism Commission. These strong words were justified, for NRC had just commissioned a radioactively racist facility, committing a severe environmental injustice. More information on the ultimately successful resistance to the PFS dump is posted on-line here: <http://archives.nirs.us/factsheets/pfsejfactsheet.htm>.

In fact, before PFS targeted the Skull Valley Goshutes for a CISF, it had targeted the Mescalero Apache in southeastern NM. This followed the U.S. DOE Nuclear Waste Negotiator's own concerted but unsuccessful targeting of both Mescalero Apache, NM as well as Skull Valley Goshutes, UT for a CISF. Such shameful environmentally racist targeting of Native American reservations for CISFs is also documented at the website link provided immediately above.

NRC should engage, or be complicit, in no more such environmental injustice and radioactive racism, such as the Holtec/ELEA CISF.

These comments are made on behalf of our members and supporters in NM, and across the country along impacted transport routes (another aspect of EJ burden associated with this scheme).

Please acknowledge receipt of these comments. Thank you.