Sign petition against radioactive metal "recycling" into consumer products!

Maureen Headington of the Stand Up/Save Lives Campaign in Illinois has organized a petition sign-on campaign that has already garnered more than 86,000 signatures in opposition to the U.S. Department of Energy's latest proposal to "recycle" radioactive metals from the nuclear weapons complex into consumer products.

You can sign the petition here.

Maureen has pointed out that her petition has hit a nerve at Forbes, where a columnist felt the need to pooh pooh concerns about radioactive metal "recycling" (radioactive poisoning of the metal recycling stream) and dumping into ordinary municipal landfills, where it can then leak into groundwater and drinking water supplies. She urges folks to read the article, and post a comment at the Forbes site.

Hanford Nuclear Reservation’s Cold War attack on the Columbia River

Another radioactive leak has sprung from a 1940’s vintage radioactive sludge storage tank at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation in southeastern Washington State. The now closed Hanford site hosts 56 million gallons of highly radioactive byproducts leftover from the nation’s nuclear weapons program since 1944.  This latest radioactive leak is coming from one of the 149 single-shell underground storage tanks originally designed for a 20-year storage period. All told, more than 1 million gallons of nuclear waste are known to have leaked from the nuclear weapons production and storage facility into the desert soil over the years. The various radioactive plumes are moving in groundwater toward the Columbia River which borders on 50 miles of the reservation as close as seven miles away from the tank farm.

This most recent discovery was announced by the Department of Energy (DOE) on February 15, 2013 with a drop in the liquid level estimated at 150 to 300 gallons per year from the total 530,000 gallons stored in a  tank identified as T-111.

Since 1989, the DOE has spent $16 billion on several schemes to manage Hanford’s nuclear waste all abandoned due to lack of credibility, cost escalations and unacceptable contractor performance. The DOE’s current plan is to finish construction of a $13.5 billion “Waste Treatment Plant” (WTP) to separate the dangerous waste stream into high-level and “low-activity” nuclear waste.  The high-level waste is to be immobilized in a glass-forming material that is then sealed in stainless steel canisters to cool and harden for eventual deep geological burial. The “low-activity” nuclear waste would be “vitrified” (immobilized in glass material) and dumped on-site.  However, the Government Accounting Office (GAO) recently warned in a December 2012 report that this massive clean-up project is already delayed beyond 2019 with out-of-control construction costs. If ever completed, the GAO identifies that the colossal operation itself will be faced with “significant safety and operation problems” due to the generation and build-up of explosive hydrogen gas in a pipeline system nearly one million linear feet long.

Facing facts, there is no “safe storage” of nuclear waste. Likewise, there is no permanent radioactive “clean-up” only “trans-contamination” of the environment.  The most responsible long-term management plan for nuclear waste is to stop generating it.  The utter and total irresponsibility of the nuclear industry is coming clearer to light with looming federal cuts to address threats from the endless legacy of the Atomic Age.  It is now paramount that the Columbia River and the American Northwest be protected from our own Cold War nuclear attack.  

Update on February 23, 2013 by admin

There are now six of  the 177 tanks  known to be leaking high-level radioactive waste at Hanford according to news accounts including the New York Times.

Mobile Chernobyl revs its engines on Capitol Hill -- help to stop it dead in its tracks!

As reported by Energy and Environment Daily, Mobile Chernobyl legislation is revving its engines on Capitol Hill. The Obama administration wants centralized interim storage for commercial irradiated nuclear fuel by 2021, which would launch unprecedented numbers of high-level radioactive waste shipments onto the roads, railways, and waterways. 

Beyond Nuclear's Kevin Kamps warned, in a letter to the editor in the Washington Post, about these irradiated nuclear fuel transport risks. This came in response to a Post editorial in support of rushed centralized interim storage.

Kevin put out a media statement in mid-January, responding to Energy Secretary Chu's call on Capitol Hill for centralized interim storage legislation. Kevin focused on the risks of radioactive waste transportation, and the radioactive waste shell game that would result from rushing into centralized interim storage.

Take action! Contact your U.S. Senators and U.S. Representative. Urge them to block this risky radioactive waste shell game. You can reach their offices via the U.S. Capitol Switchboard, (202) 224-3121.

Contact the White House. Urge President Obama to put the brakes on the Mobile Chernobyls, dirty bombs on wheels, and Floating Fukushimas.

What are the alternatives? Well, we need to stop the generation of irradiated nuclear fuel in the first place. Atomic reactors should be permanently shutdown, their electricity supply replaced with energy efficiency, as well as renewable sources such as wind and solar.

For the wastes which already exist, hardened on-site storage -- endorsed by 170 environmental groups, representing all 50 states -- is an interim measure, addressing the potentially catastrophic risks of current indoor wet pool and outdoor dry cask storage vulnerabilities to accident, attack, and leakage.

Update on February 14, 2013 by admin

Greenwire has reported on Senators Wyden and Murkowski cooperating to move forward centralized interim storage legislation.

Update on February 21, 2013 by admin

While the Yucca Mountain dump proposal has been wisely canceled by the Obama administration, its Feb. 2002 U.S. Dept. of Energy Final Environmental Impact Statement still reveals nonetheless that opening a permanent repository -- or even centralized interim storage sites -- will launch unprecented numbers of risky irradiated nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste shipments onto the roads and rails through most states: see Appendix J, including national transport maps on pages J-24 and J-25; maps, and charts showing projected shipment numbers, for individual states and regions of the country can be found from Page J-134 to J-173.

But, it's not just truck and train shipments that would be launched. So too would barge shipments, in a number of states' waterways. This is because 26 atomic reactors across the U.S. lack direct rail access. DOE has indicated it prefers to ship highly radioactive waste in giant (100 ton or heavier) rail casks. To transfer wastes to the nearest rail head, either heavy haul trucks, or else barges, would have to be used.

Barge shipment maps can be found from Page J-78 to J-81. They include the following: Chesapeake Bay; James River of VA; Delaware Bay; waterways surrounding New York City in NY, NJ, and CT; Cape Cod Bay, Massachusetts Bay, and Boston Harbor in MA; Lake Michigan, bordered by WI, IL, IN, and MI; the Mississippi River in AR, MS, and LA; the Tennessee River in AL; the Missouri River in NE; California's Pacific coastline; and Florida's Atlantic coastline.

As documented in the preceding links, a severe accident, or terrorist attack, upon highly radioactive waste barge shipments could release disastrous amounts of hazardous radioactivity into our country's surface waters. In that sense, these shipments represent "Floating Fukushima" risks, a phrase coined by Nuclear Information and Resource Service (NIRS). A fact that makes the use of high-level radioactive waste barges even more likely, in this rush to open centralized interim storage sites, is that the Savannah River Site in South Carolina -- near the Atlantic coastline -- is at the top of the target list.

Risks to Pilgrim's high-level radioactive waste storage pool from major blizzard go unreported

While there has been some media coverage about the potential risks to the Pilgrim reactor near Boston from this past weekend's major blizzard, there has been little to no mention of the risks to Pilgrim's high-level radioactive waste storage pool.

For example, Reuters has reported that on Sunday, off-site electricity was fortunately restored to Pilgrim, after having been cut off on Friday night. The blizzard knocked out Pilgrim's three connections to the off-site electrical grid, but emergency diesel generators fortunately continued supplying the power needed to run safety and cooling systems on the reactor, the NRC has reported.

However, not mentioned by news media coverage, and little known, is the fact that NRC does not require emergency back up power on the high-level radioactive waste storage pools. Under NRC's lax regulations, pools can rely entirely, and exclusively, on the electrical grid for the running of cooling water circulation pumps. Thus, when the grid goes down, the pool begins to heat up. After enough hours or days without water circulation, the pool can begin to boil. If the evaporation goes on long enough, the pool water can boil away the water cover over the stored irradiated fuel. If the high-level radioactive waste is exposed to air, it can quickly catch fire. As pools are not required to be located within primary radiological containment structures, either (see graphic, above left), this means that catastrophic radioactivity releases into the environment could result from a pool fire, as Alvarez et al. warned in Jan. 2003, in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks.

Pilgrim's pool contains all the high-level radioactive waste ever generated there. None has yet been moved to dry cask storage, a very rare exception in the U.S. nuclear power industry. After more than four decades of exclusively pool storage, however, Entergy has applied to NRC for permission to begin moving some fraction of the pool's inventory into dry casks.

Entergy admits its faulty equipment caused 35 minute Super Bowl "lights out"

The darkened Superdome evoked memories of Hurricane Katrina, when thousands of displaced New Orleans residents took refuge in the stadium as an emergency shelter of last resort.First, Entergy denied any responsibility, instead pointing fingers at the Superdome. Then, Entergy agreed to the need for an investigation. And now, five days later, Entergy admits that its faulty equipment was the culprit that plunged the Super Bowl -- and 75,000 in-stadium fans -- into darkness for 35 long minutes. 108.4 million others watched the darkness on television.

It's not unlike that time in Vermont, when Entergy officials testified, under oath, to state officials, that no underground piping existed at Vermont Yankee which could possibly be conducting radioactive materials. Only to have to admit a short time later, that those very pipes which it had denied even existed, were leaking tritium and other radioactive contaminants into soil, groundwater, and the Connecticut River.

Or that time, when it took over at the Palisades atomic reactor in Michigan, when it promised it would replace the corroded reactor lid and degraded steam generators, as well as deal with the worst embrittled reactor pressure vessel in the U.S. -- but never did.

As shown by the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear catastrophe, a prolonged power outage -- no matter what the cause (earthquake and tsunami, other natural disaster, faulty equipment, terrorist attack) -- denying electricity to the safety and cooling systems at nuclear power plants could lead to reactor meltdowns, and high-level radioactive waste storage pool fires.

The Chicago Tribune has reported on Entergy's mea culpa for causing the Super Bowl lights out. CBS Sports has reported that documents revealed concerns about electrical failures in the months leading up to the game. More.