Search
JOIN OUR NETWORK

     

     

 

 

« Expert witness declarations by James David Ballard, Ph.D., re: CISF transport and away from reactor storage risks | Main | Holtec/ELEA CISF oral argument pre-hearings to be held in Albuquerque, Jan. 23-24 »
Wednesday
Nov282018

FASKEN AND PBLRO’S REPLY TO ISP’s OPPOSITION TO HEARING REQUEST AND PETITION TO INTERVENE

Fasken Lands and Minerals, Ltd., and Permian Basin Land and Royalty Owners, filed a REPLY, in their ongoing opposition to Waste Control Specialists/Interim Storage Partners in Andrews County, TX. Robert Eye of Lawrence, Kansas serves as legal counsel for Fasken and PBLRO.

Fasken, an oil and natural gas extraction company, and PBLRO, oppose the Holtec International/Eddy-Lea Energy Alliance in southeastern NM as well.

The centralized interim storage facility (CISF) in TX would hold 40,000 metric tons of commercial irradiated nuclear fuel; the CISF in NM would hold 173,600 metric tons of commercial irradiated nuclear fuel.