Search
JOIN OUR NETWORK

     

     

 

 

ARTICLE ARCHIVE

Entries from June 1, 2020 - June 30, 2020

Tuesday
Jun302020

What's causing the radiations spikes from Russia? This week on The Update

Unusually high-levels of man-made radioactive isotopes have been detected across Europe, coming from Western Russia. The Russians deny any problems with their nuclear power plants there. So what caused this latest radiation spike? Could it be another failed test of Russia's nuclear-powered cruise missile? The Update explores these questions and more.

Tuesday
Jun302020

The Thom Hartmann Program: 173,000 Tons of Nuclear Waste Under Your Feet! (w/Beyond Nuclear)

Thom HartmannThey want to double the amount of nuclear waste buried under your feet... Trump wants to test nuclear weapons ... you are about to be exposed to nuclear waste ... Nuclear waste is about to be buried in New Mexico. Really? A vast waste facility to be built in NM with both reprocessing and simply dumping it. How will the fresh water you drink be affected? Kevin Kamps joined Thom to discover the news of nuclear waste coming to NM.

Thom Hartmann (photo, left) hosts Beyond Nuclear's Kevin Kamps. Watch/listen to the recording, here.

Saturday
Jun272020

NEVADA VIEWS: Nuclear tests and the Shoshone people, by Ian Zabarte

Updated - Saturday, June 27, 2020

The Nevada National Security Site (formerly known as the Nevada Test Site) is on Western Shoshone land. So too is the proposed Yucca Mountain high-level radioactive waste dump.

Friday
Jun262020

The Space Farce

Congress may not authorize funding for Trump's new dangerous plaything, the US Space Force, but it's still gobbling up millions of dollars while bases are renamed, flags and uniforms are designed and Trump threatens total dominance in space. Linda Pentz Gunter on Nuclear Hotseat.

 

Friday
Jun262020

The nuclear industry once again falsely represents its true costs

Edited from various media sources:

The application to build a new UK nuclear power station has been accepted for examination by the planning inspectorate. Plans for the Sizewell C plant on the Suffolk coast were put forward by EDF Energy after being mooted 10 years ago. The acceptance means an examining authority will now be appointed to scrutinize the application, with the government having final decision. Stop Sizewell C (SSC) group said it will continue to fight the application. 

However, EDF has now admitted that its proposed nuclear plant in Suffolk will cost £20 billion, far more than had been anticipated. The costs of new nuclear plants are under intense scrutiny after huge increases at other projects, including the Hinkley Point C project EDF is building in Somerset, which is Britain’s first new nuclear plant in a generation. At Hinkley, EDF is liable for the multi-billion pound cost overruns, in return for a subsidy contract guaranteeing it a high fixed price for the electricity it eventually generates. The government is considering a new funding model EDF has proposed for Sizewell under which consumers would start paying for the plant while it is under construction and share in the cost overruns. EDF has said that this will enable it to generate electricity more cheaply.

EDF had previously suggested the plant could be built for 20% less than Hinkley Point C. This implied a cost of about £18bn. The revelation will reignite a furious debate about large nuclear stations. Some backbench Conservative MPs have concerns about the involvement of the Chinese company, CGN. Doug Parr of Greenpeace UK said that the industry’s claim that it can make the next nuclear station cheaper was “just never true”.