Search
JOIN OUR NETWORK

     

     

 

 

ARTICLE ARCHIVE
« We can't afford another Fukushima | Main | Beyond Nuclear before ASLB to stop last Mark I "Fukushima" reactor relicensing »
Monday
Dec012014

UNSCEAR should be "disbanded." Its Fukushima conclusions are not "scientific"

From The Asahi ShimbunA British scientist who studied the health effects of the 1986 Chernobyl disaster panned a United Nations report that virtually dismissed the possibility of higher cancer rates caused by the 2011 Fukushima nuclear crisis.

Keith Baverstock (pictured) said a report released in April by the U.N. Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) was “not qualified to be called ‘scientific’” because it lacked transparency and independent verification. He added that the committee should be disbanded.

The U.N. report said any increase in overall cancer rates among residents of Fukushima Prefecture due to fallout from the accident was unlikely. Read more.